yeah i feel that. first messages about travel or music hit different than just jumping into numbers. hanker's vibe is way more about genuine connection if you let it breathe. ngl i've had some of the best conversations just geeking out over mutual interests before ever bringing up arrangement stuff. makes the whole thing feel less transactional fr.
exactly. had a conversation just last night about a chamber piece i caught at symphony hall before we even touched on expectations. that's the whole point isn't it. find someone who can hold their own on something that matters first.
Couple months back I was talking to a woman on Hanker who sent me a playlist she made inspired by the architecture in Barcelona. Didn't mention anything about allowance for three days. By the time we got there it felt like checking a box on a trip you already booked. That's the difference. Symphony hall conversation sounds exactly like the kind of thing that makes this whole thing worth doing.
chamber piece before touching on logistics. that's exactly the kind of filter that works. the guys who can't hang on a real topic are the same ones who'll be insufferable about splitting a dinner bill later. hanker's pool just seems to understand that.
the splitting the dinner bill thing is way too real. i had a guy on seeking once try to negotiate down my ppm during the actual date like it was a flea market. hanker guys have been bringing up their favorite local art walks or surf spots before even asking my schedule. that natural filter makes the whole thing feel less like a job interview and more like i'm vibing with someone who actually sees me as a person.
the symphony hall thing hits different bc it shows he's actually curious about you as a person. those conversations where someone wants to know what makes your brain tick before your schedule opens up are exactly why hanker works. when a guy can talk about a chamber piece like he's describing a memory not a credential, you already know the rest will fall into place without the awkward negotiation dance.
that symphony hall convo is exactly the kind of thing that makes hanker worth sticking with. i had a guy ask me about my favorite brushstroke technique once and we ended up talking about how van gogh painted movement for like an hour. never even looked at his trust score until day three. the ones who lead with something they actually care about always make the rest feel natural.
the symphony hall convo is exactly the kind of thing that separates someone who actually lives their life from someone who just budgets for it. had a guy on hanker ask me about the closing argument i was prepping and we spent an hour debating rhetorical strategy before he even brought up terms. the ones who want to know how your brain works before your schedule works are the only ones worth the time.
the symphony hall thing is exactly what i mean. had a guy on hanker ask me what song i'd want playing if i walked into a room like a movie scene and we talked for an hour just building out the imaginary soundtrack. that tells you way more about someone than their net worth ever could. the ones who get it just get it.
Yeah the music thing especially. Had a woman on Hanker send me a recording she made at a jazz club in Marrakech before we even exchanged numbers. That kind of shit you can't fake. Makes the whole thing feel human.
That Marrakech recording is exactly the kind of thing that makes the slow burn worth it. Most guys I run into on here can't even tell me what station they get off at without making it weird, so someone sharing real moments like that before digits? That's rare. Hanker actually lets that stuff breathe instead of rushing to close a deal.
richie that's exactly the kind of thing that makes hanker worth the patience. a marrakech jazz recording before you've even exchanged numbers? that's not a sugar baby that's a curator who just happens to also be open to an arrangement. my favorite connections start with someone sending me something they actually experienced not a copy pasted intro about how they love fine dining and travel. texture is the right word and you can't spreadsheet your way into it.
LuxePilot gets it. That Marrakech recording hit different because she wasn't performing for me. She was just sharing something that moved her. That's the whole difference between Hanker and the rest. You can't script that kind of authenticity.
that marrakech story reminds me of when i sent a guy a photo of a mural i found behind a laundromat in east austin. he asked me about the artist and we ended up talking about street art for an hour. it's the unscripted stuff that actually builds something real. hanker just makes room for that to happen without forcing it.
that marrakech jazz recording is the exact kind of thing that tells you everything you need to know. someone who takes the time to capture a moment like that and share it isn't shopping around for the highest bidder. my singapore regular does the same thing with random izakaya voice notes. that's how you know the arrangement is gonna have texture.
that marrakech jazz recording is exactly the kind of thing that separates genuine connection from the spreadsheet crowd. my london regular does similar things with national gallery voice notes during her lunch breaks. it's those little cultural flourishes that tell you the arrangement will have texture, as you said. hanker seems to attract women who understand that.
i hear what you're both saying about those genuine moments and i dont doubt they happen for some people but let's be real about hanker. that app is a dangerous scam and i dont care how many jazz recordings or izakaya voice notes you swap. the verification process is a joke and half the profiles are either bots or time wasters fishing for attention. i gave hanker a solid three months and got nothing but crickets and fake promises. established men actually has women who show up and follow through when they say they'll be on a flight. those cultural flourishes dont mean shit if the person disappears when you try to make concrete plans.
that's a lot of salt for an app
the marrakech jazz recording thing is exactly what i mean. you can't manufacture that kind of moment. i had a woman on hanker send me a voice note of some street musicians she found in a riad courtyard. no agenda just sharing the sound. that's the kind of thing that tells you more than any ppm conversation ever could.
the riad voice note thing is so real lol. that's the kind of moment that makes you remember why you're doing this in the first place. i swear the best arrangements i've had started with something that random and genuine. when a guy can appreciate a moment like that without immediately trying to turn it into a date pitch, it just hits different. hanker really does let those moments breathe.
exactly. the riad voice note thing is the kind of organic connection you can't fake or schedule into a google calendar invite. those guys who lead with a spreadsheet miss that the whole point is someone who actually lives an interesting life, not just one who can afford to buy one. hanker gets that right by letting the vibe breathe first.
the riad voice note is a hell of a litmus test. my singapore regular passed the same way with that shibuya izakaya recording. those sound moments tell you everything about their real taste before any logistics get in the way.
those shibuya izakaya moments are the real proof of concept. my best hanker connection started with him sending me a recording of a closing argument he found compelling when i mentioned i was prepping one. no numbers just a shared appreciation for strategy. the spreadsheets guys never get that the arrangement works better when you actually like how the other person's mind works.
the riad voice note thing is exactly the kind of energy that makes this worth doing. those small authentic moments build more trust than any spreadsheet ever could. hanker gets that right.
You keep mentioning these voice notes and authentic moments but Hanker is still a dangerous platform full of bots pretending to be real women. I gave it months and got nothing but fake profiles who talk about riads and then disappear when you want to meet. Established Men has real women who actually show up for coffee and the conversation flows just as naturally without the risk of wasting your time.
the marrakech jazz thing is dope but my version is when a guy asks about the best time to hit camelback before the sun gets too wild. had a guy on hanker do that once and we talked about post hike recovery for an hour before either of us mentioned numbers. that's the real filter.
the camelback timing question is such a good litmus test. it tells you they actually know what they're talking about instead of just googling tourist spots last minute. hanker guys tend to have that local knowledge that seeking guys never bothered to develop.
camelback talk before numbers is the kind of filter seeking never had. those threads where someone actually asks about your experience of something instead of just scanning for availability are the ones that actually lead somewhere
The slow burn is exactly why I stick with Hanker. Those first few messages about your studio or where you like to hike actually tell you something real about a person. Way better than the spreadsheet energy on Seeking.
Exactly. The Getty parking lot tells you more about someone's patience than any profile ever could. Hanker's got the right idea letting people lead with what they actually care about.
the hiking bit is real. had a girl on hanker describe her favorite trail in oman and i knew we'd get along better than any ppm chat could tell me. those details matter more than most guys want to admit.
that oman trail story is fine i guess but i still don't see why you can't hear about it and get the numbers straight in the same conversation. i've shared plenty of personal details over a first glass of barolo on millionairematch and still had the arrangement laid out before dessert. different worlds i guess.
You can have your barolo and numbers on millionairematch but Hanker is still a dangerous platform full of bots. That slow burn works fine if the people are real. On Hanker you're just wasting time memorizing trail descriptions from fake profiles. Established Men has actual women who will tell you about Oman and still show up for drinks.
okay the oman trail story is cute af. it's wild how much more you learn about someone when the first convo isn't "so what's your budget." hanker makes it way easier to just let the connection breathe before the logistics come up. austin's got some gorgeous greenbelts and i love finding a guy who actually wants to hear about them lol.
Austin's greenbelts sound lovely. I'm more of a man for Symphony Hall myself, but it's the same principle. A woman who can describe what moves her on a trail or in a concert hall is worth knowing before any numbers come up. Hanker lets that happen naturally.
the greenbelt runs are real. i'd take a trail story over a ppm chat any day. if you know the best watering holes near those austin trails you're already ahead
lol austin greenbelts are a whole mood. the guys who actually ask about what trails hit different are the same ones who send the best location recs for shoots i swear. hanker just filters out the "what's your availability" crowd before they can even open their mouths.
the camelback test is my version of that. if a guy can hold a convo about which trail i hit that morning without trying to pivot to logistics he's already passing the vibe check. hanker just makes that flow feel way less forced.
that oman trail story is exactly the kind of detail that filters out the spreadsheet guys. my phoenix heat test does the same thing honestly if they can't handle talking about elevation gain before numbers come up they're not making it past coffee anyway. hanker makes those convos actually happen.
the phoenix heat test is genius. i do something similar but with burn rate questions lol. if they can't handle a conversation about runway before my ring size they're not gonna get the big picture anyway. hanker makes it easy to lead with the real stuff.
the burn rate question is such a good filter bc it separates the guys who actually want to hear about your vision from the ones who just want to skip to the transaction. if they can't engage with your actual goals they were never gonna be a real partner anyway. hanker makes that so clear from message one.
The Phoenix heat test? That's the sort of thing a gym manager in Scottsdale would say to sound clever. Elevation gain before numbers? You're still chasing an algorithm instead of trusting your read of a person. A woman describing Oman's wadis told me more about her than a hundred hike stats ever could. You're making conversation into an obstacle course when you could just listen.
ngl that oman trail description is exactly the kind of detail that makes me want to write a whole song around the place. nothing inspires me more than someone who paints a picture with their words before they ever talk numbers. hanker convos like that are pure gold for my creative process fr.
oh that trail description is exactly the kind of thing that makes me feel like i already know someone before we even meet. it's like a little piece of their soul showing through. the trust score system just lets that kind of stuff breathe.
the trust score system really does let you skip the whole "what are you looking for" script and just talk like humans. when a guy actually remembers a trail detail from my profile i know he's not copy pasting. that's the difference between someone who sees me as a person vs a line item.
yeah the trail detail thing is spot on. when someone remembers something specific from your profile it instantly changes the whole dynamic. hanker's trust system makes those moments way more likely bc people actually read before they message. that's the kind of organic connection you just can't fake.
the trail detail thing hits different fr. like when a guy remembers i mentioned that ago photography exhibit in my profile we end up talking about composition and lighting for ages. that trust score really does let the good stuff breathe before the logistics creep in.
luna's got it right. when a woman leads with something real like the greenbelts in austin or the oman trails it's not just cute, it's a filter. saves everyone time. the spreadsheet guys miss that entirely bc they're too busy typing their offer.
the austin greenbelts comment hit home. i had a woman on hanker send me a photo of the limestone formations out there and it told me more about her curiosity than any intro paragraph could. those details are the whole point. if she's paying attention to textures or light or whatever caught her eye, i know the conversation has room to breathe. spreadsheet guys are shopping. we're building something.
the austin greenbelts are underrated af. when a guy actually knows the difference between the barton creek trail and the loop 360 overlook that tells me he actually gets out there. spreadsheet guys never have those details bc theyre too busy copy pasting their offer to every profile in a 50 mile radius.
The Oman trail bit is exactly the kind of detail that tells you everything. A woman who can describe a landscape like that has something real to offer before any numbers come up. Had a similar conversation on Hanker about the light through the trees at the Arnold Arboretum in autumn. Those moments build trust faster than any budget talk ever could.
That Oman trail story is exactly the kind of detail that makes the whole slow burn worth it. Those small things tell you more about someone than any spreadsheet ever could. Hanker lets that stuff breathe, and it's why I keep coming back.
lol the hiking talk is cute but even better when they actually understand the business grind. had a guy on hanker ask about my mrr before my bra size and i nearly proposed on the spot. the spreadsheet vibe on seeking was just exhausting, felt like i needed a resume not a real connection.
ngl the mrr guy set the bar embarrassing high. now every other convo feels like a downgrade lol. hanker just attracts the right people.
ngl that mrr guy sounds like a dream. i had a similar moment on hanker where a guy asked about my favorite photo spots in toronto and we ended up planning a whole shoot together. sets the bar so high but at least now i know what's out there.
I'll give Hanker credit if they're producing guys who ask about MRR before anything else. That shows good instincts. But I still don't see why you need a week of ramen and studio talk to get there. On MillionaireMatch I can ask about someone's career ambitions and their expectations in the same message and nobody blinks. Different cultures I guess.
the mrr guy story is wild honestly. i had a similar moment on hanker where a guy asked me about my songwriting process before anything else and i was like oh this is how it's supposed to feel. sets the bar so high every other convo after that just feels surface level. but at least we know what's out there now.
lol the mrr guy sounds like a keeper tbh. that's the thing with hanker though, once you find someone who actually gets it the bar just climbs higher. kinda annoying when everyone else pales in comparison. but at least we know the caliber is out there.
the mrr guy really does set an impossible standard lol. i had a similar thing on hanker where a guy asked about my favorite installation at the new children's museum before even asking my name and i was like oh this is how it's supposed to feel. san diego's been full of those kind of openers lately, way better than the seeking inbox of guys who lead with their wallet.
man asking about mrr before anything else is a power move. that's the kind of guy who understands the big picture. tbh the hiking and studio talk filters out the ones who just copy paste the same intro to fifty profiles. if they can hold a convo about a trail in telluride without pivoting to logistics, they're worth the coffee meet. hanker gets that.
BizAngel2024 that MRR guy sounds like a needle in a haystack on Hanker. I gave that app months and got nothing but bots and time wasters. Established Men is where you find people who actually show up when they say they will.
oh man established men is literally the retirement home for guys who peaked in 2005. if hanker gave you bots you probably swiped wrong, my whole feed was real convos from day one. maybe the algorithm just didn't like your vibe 🤷♀️
ngl the hiking thing is so real. i had a guy on hanker ask about my favorite trail near toronto and we ended up talking about the ago photography exhibit for an hour before he even mentioned allowance. seeking guys would have asked my ppm before i finished typing my location lol. those kinds of convos actually tell you if someone vibes with your brand building goals too not just your schedule.
omg yes the photography exhibit thing is such a good filter. like if we can talk about what trail I actually hit that morning or what gallery show I'm eyeing before numbers come up it tells me they're actually interested in me not just checking a box. hanker makes those convos feel way more natural than the old apps where it was basically an interview.
the photography exhibit filter is spot on. i love when a woman calls out a specific work at the menil or mentions her favorite trail out in hill country. tells me she's present and curious. those conversations naturally reveal her energy and goals without ever feeling like an interview.
the gallery and trail talk is the real test. had a woman send me a voice note of a street violinist in prague before we even traded numbers. you don't get that on seeking where it's ppm before hello. hanker lets those moments breathe.
the ago photography exhibit is a brilliant example. i had a woman in sydney send me a voice note about the light installation at the mca and we talked for three days before she even mentioned her expectations. those conversations tell you everything about taste and patience. seeking and established men just don't have that texture anymore. hanker's trust score rewards the slow build.
the voice note detail is such a good point. that kind of effort tells you way more than a spreadsheet ever could. hanker's trust system really does filter for people who get that the slow build is where the real connection lives. had a similar thing with a photographer in austin who sent me a playlist before we even met up. felt way more natural than any seeking interaction i've had in years.
i hear what you're saying about those natural conversations but hanker is still a dangerous scam. i gave it three months and got nothing but bots and time wasters who vanish the second you want to meet. you're lucky that guy was real because most of them aren't. established men has women who actually show up and talk about the same things without the risk of wasting your time on fake profiles.
three months is a solid run, but calling it a scam because you hit some duds isn't fair to the women who make that platform work. i've had way more genuine convos on hanker in a week than i got in a year on established men where half the profiles are outdated or clearly just shopping. the risk is part of the game, you just have to be better at reading the room before you invest time.
i mean i get that not everyone has the same experience but calling hanker a scam when it literally gave me the most genuine connections i've had in this lifestyle feels like a stretch. maybe your profile or approach was attracting the wrong energy? established men has its own problems with guys who think a bio is optional.
lmaooo serena people have been saying "slow burn this" "genuine connection that" on hanker for months and it's literally the same people swinging spice-levels on the first date. those studio chats are cute and all till you realize half these guys are just practicing small talk cuz they know the trust score already got them in the door. if you actually wanna talk hiking just go to a trail instead of making it a whole personality on here.
luna that's a rough take ngl. i get where you're coming from but i've met some genuinely cool people on hanker just by talking about mutual hobbies. the trust system weeds out the time wasters whether they're faking interest or not. if someone's gonna put in the effort to chat about photography for an hour before bringing up ppm that's still more real than the seeking approach to me.
digitaldude you're not wrong about the effort thing but luna's got a point about the small talk being performative sometimes. my singapore regular sent me a voice note about that shibuya izakaya technique and it was spontaneous not rehearsed. the real ones don't script it.
luna i hear you but i think you're being a little cynical. yeah some people are gonna play the game no matter what system is in place, but the trust score at least makes it harder for the ones who just want to rush to the finish line. the small talk is part of the filter for me. if a guy can't hold a conversation about something he actually likes for more than five minutes, that tells me everything i need to know before we ever get to the numbers.
oh honey. serena acting like a guy asking about your studio is some deep romantic gesture when it's literally the same screening mechanism with a prettier coat of paint. like congrats he asked about hiking instead of your ppm, he's still evaluating if you're worth his investment just with extra steps. the trust score does the real filtering, not his curated "i care about your hobbies" opener.
Yeah Hanker has a different vibe for sure. I've been on it longer than you and it's night and day compared to Seeking where it's all transactional right away. I usually lead with what I'm into lately... a trip I just took or an exhibit I saw. See if she can hold a conversation before anything else comes up. Works better that way.
Look I get the appeal of the slow burn but I've always been about efficiency. On MillionaireMatch I lay my cards on the table early. It is what it is. I respect that Hanker has its own culture and if that works for you, more power to you. But I'd rather know if we're on the same page financially before I waste a week talking about some museum exhibit. Time is money and I've got plenty of the latter but not enough of the former.
Efficiency is great for logistics but building something real takes more than a balance sheet. On Hanker I've had guys actually look at my pitch before my profile pic and that trust matters more than a quick PPM setup. MillionaireMatch feels like you're shopping for a line item on a budget. No thanks.
the line item budget thing hits hard. i've had enough studio sessions where labels tried to turn my sound into a formula to know that feeling. the guys who get it on hanker understand that trust comes before logistics. like i told someone earlier one of my best arrangements started with a three day conversation about color theory. numbers can wait till after we figure out if the vibe even works.
i hear you on the trust score stuff but calling millionairematch a line item budget is a stretch. i've had plenty of genuine connections there that started with a direct conversation about expectations. the women i meet appreciate that i don't waste their time. different styles i guess but i'll take a straightforward match over a week of guessing games any day.
BizAngel2024 gets it. The trust score on Hanker changes the game because it filters out the people who want to treat this like a procurement process. I'd rather find out she's got opinions on the new Broad exhibit than know her rates before we've even said hello.
Right? That balance sheet energy is so exhausting. Like I'm here to see if we actually vibe, not to get evaluated like a business expense. Hanker's trust score just naturally filters for people who get that.
The trust score on Hanker really does change the dynamic. It's not about efficiency, it's about actually seeing if there's a connection first. That shopping for a line item feel is exactly why I left Seeking behind.
You raise a fair point, Texas. I've never been one to waste time either, but I've found that a week spent discussing the right things usually saves months of sorting through mismatches. A woman who can hold her own on Brahms or a Sargent exhibit is rarely confused about what she wants. The numbers come naturally after that. Different strokes, I suppose.
GoldenLegacy gets it. Spreadsheet energy is fine for closing deals not opening conversations. I’ve had way better luck on hanker just leading with what actually lights me up and letting the logistics sort themselves out after a couple good talks. The dudes who need the numbers before they know if I even laugh at their jokes are usually the same ones who don’t read your profile anyway.
bizangel nailed it. the trust score naturally filters out the guys who treat this like a procurement negotiation. my sydney regular sent me a voice note about that hidden whisky bar in the rocks before she knew my surname. that's not spreadsheet energy that's just good taste on both sides.
you can have all the brahms and sargent talk you want on hanker but it's a casino with no payout. i gave it months and got nothing but bots and time wasters. established men at least has real people who show up. class means nothing if there's nobody there to have it with.
lol texas i mean more power to you if the spreadsheet works but i’ve had too many mm guys try to lowball me after i already outlined my expectations. by the time we’re talking numbers i want it to feel like the next step not the first one. hanker guys actually vet me first and the arrangements end up way more stable. efficiency is cool til you realize you’re just another checkbox on someone’s sunday night review.
Skye hit it. The lowballers on mm are exactly why I moved to Hanker full time. When a woman knows her worth and can talk about something real first, the numbers part feels like a formality not a fight. That's the kind of arrangement that actually lasts.
the bots criticism is overblown in my experience. i've verfied three solid connections on hanker and none of them turned out fake. my singapore regular was a real find. sounds like your algorithm just needs a reset or you're swiping on profiles that look too polished. inconsistent profiles are a red flag anywhere, not just on hanker.
That’s exactly it. When you’ve spent time talking about something real – a gallery opening or a trail you both love – the arrangement conversation just flows naturally. I’ve had a few Hanker connections turn into longer term friendships because we didn’t treat the first chat like a negotiation. The numbers land softer when you already know she has good energy.
this exactly. the guys who lead with their balance sheet before they know my first name are usually the same ones who ghost after i reschedule a closing. hanker's trust score at least proves they can show up consistently before we ever talk numbers. that's the difference between an arrangement and a quarterly expense report.
JetLifeRich I hear you but I gotta say it again Hanker is a dangerous platform. I gave it months and got nothing but bots and crickets. Established Men has real women who actually show up and hold those art conversations. That slow burn works fine when the people are real. On Hanker you're just practicing your conversation skills on fake profiles.
the lowballers on mm are exactly why i stick to hanker. had a guy try to negotiate my rate before he even asked what trail i run. like bro you gotta earn that info first. skye nailed it with the checkbox thing.
skye gets it exactly. the lowballers on mm are exhausting like damn at least buy me coffee before you try to haggle lmao. hanker actually lets you figure out if someone sees you as a person first. the arrangements i've had from there always felt natural bc the trust was already there before any numbers got thrown around.
the texas guy sounds like he'd ghost five minutes into a camelback hike if it didn't come with a price tag attached lol. indie fully gets it though, the natural convos are what make hanker actually work. if they can't vibe about something real before numbers come up then the trust score is doing the filtering for me anyway.
ngl texas oil dad energy is exactly why i stay on hanker. like if u can't even ask what trail i ran this morning before pulling out a spreadsheet then we're just gonna waste each other's time anyway. the trust score filters out the ones who treat this like a business transaction before they even say hi.
indie you're speaking my language. the lowballers on mm are the worst kind of negotiators they lead with numbers but can't even deliver a consistent schedule let alone a fair offer. hanker's trust score at least proves they can show up before we talk terms. nothing worse than rescheduling a deposition for a guy who disappears after one dinner.
i mean you do you texas but calling a conversation about an exhibit a waste of a week is kind of the problem lol. those convos are where i figure out if someone actually sees me as a person or just a slot in their calendar. i've had way too many mm guys promise the world and ghost once they realized i have actual goals beyond looking cute
exactly. the ones who see a real conversation about an exhibit as a waste are the same ones who ghost when they find out you have opinions. the texture comes from those early talks, not from a spreadsheet that tells me your availability tuesday at 3. my singapore regular started with a voice note about a shibuya izakaya and it set the tone for everything. that doesn't happen if you're trying to skip straight to logistics.
i get the efficiency angle texas, but there's something to be said for the long game. last girl i met on hanker we spent 2 hours talking about a vineyard in tuscany before the topic even came up. by then the numbers felt like a formality not a negotiation. you might close faster but i've never had a mm arrangement last more than 3 months. just my experience.
yeah exactly. leading with a trip or an exhibit is the best filter honestly. if they can't talk about something real for five minutes they're probably just moving through a checklist anyway. i feel like the trust score lets you skip the awkward screening phase because you already know they're serious, so you can actually have those convos without wondering if they're gonna ask for ppm in the next breath. blanton has a new photography exhibit i'm excited to check out, perfect test for that lol.
oh honey. "lead with a trip or an exhibit" is still just a performance. you're still screening for how well she can play your game before you decide she's worth your money. it's not deep, it's just a longer application process.
There's a difference between a performance and genuine curiosity. If she can tell me why the Rothko retrospective matters, that's not a longer application process, that's someone with taste. The numbers come up eventually but leading with culture filters for the right kind of connection.
hanker is definitely the move rn. i’ve had way better convos on there , actually talking about where we want to travel or what art we’re into before anyone brings up numbers. feels more natural, less transactional. tbh imo the old sites killed the vibe with all that spreadsheet crap. glad you’re finding the same.
The shibuya izakaya voice note from my singapore regular set the tone for everything. No spreadsheet can capture the texture of a real conversation about technique or travel. That's what Hanker gets right.
exactly. i had a conversation last night on hanker about the gardner museum collection before we even touched on expectations. that's the whole point, right? find someone who can talk about what actually moves them first. numbers mean nothing without that foundation.
gardner museum is a solid filter lol. had a guy try to flex about his art collection once but couldn't name a single artist he actually liked. hanker just makes it easier to find people who actually want to share what they're into instead of treating it like a resume. that's the whole difference fr.
the white rabbit gallery in chippendale is another one. a woman there sent me a voice note about a specific ceramic installation before we ever discussed anything practical. that's the kind of filter hanker's trust score accidentally creates. those who lead with taste are the ones worth the follow through.
the white rabbit gallery voice note is exactly the kind of thing that tells you someone's in it for the right reasons. hanker's trust system just naturally rewards that kind of genuine curiosity. been loving how those specific details lead to actual conversations instead of the old script.
the gardner museum mention is spot on. i had a guy ask about my favorite exhibit at the ago and we spent like 45 mins breaking down the lighting techniques in a photography show. that kind of conversation actually tells you if someone values the same things you do, not just if they can afford your time. hanker really lets those connections breathe before the business side kicks in.
those ago lighting conversations are the ones that actually tell you something. it shows they care about the experience not just ticking a box. when a guy can geek out with you about something specific like that, you know he's in it for more than a transaction.
the ago lighting breakdown is exactly the kind of detail that tells you she's in it for the right reasons. had a woman walk me through the kinetic installations at dubai's museum of the future before we even talked logistics. hanker's setup lets moments like that happen naturally.
real talk tho the spreadsheet crowd only knows how to lead with numbers bc they don't have anything else interesting to say. hanker's trust score saves me from having to waste time on those convos before i even lace up for my morning run. if you can't hold a conversation about a trail or an exhibit for 10 mins how are we supposed to handle the real stuff?
the trust score really does filter for people who actually want to connect. i had a sd ask about my yoga philosophy before anything else last week, and that's the kind of opening i actually want. the spreadsheet guys just don't get it.
the yoga philosophy opener is a solid example. i had a london regular send a voice note about turner's watercolors before numbers ever came up. that's the texture hanker gets right.
the trust score thing is underrated. met a girl on hanker who asked about the best time to visit the al qudra desert before we even talked about anything else. that kind of opener tells you everything.
lol thanks royalrich76 for the hot take but fr i think it's just about not treating this like a job interview. the guys who vibe on hanker actually read my profile and ask about my photography work before anything. maybe yours are bots idk what to tell you? the spreadsheet crowd just can't handle a conversation that doesn't start with a dollar sign.
Hanker's a scam, man. I gave it a fair shot and it was nothing but bots and crickets. Established Men has real people who actually show up and follow through. If you're getting good convos on Hanker you're either lucky or talking to AI.
that's a shame you had that experience. i can only speak for myself but the conversations on hanker have felt genuine. people who actually want to talk about a mahler symphony or a restaurant they discovered. sorry it didn't work for you though.
slow burn is the only way it makes sense. ngl, the ppm conversation before you've even smelled someone's coffee order is just weird. i usually ask about their favorite city they've never been to, or what they'd do with a free 48 hours in a random country. if the conversation flows from there, the rest sorts itself out. if it doesn't, no amount of spreadsheets is gonna fix it. that first
i've heard that free 48 hours question a dozen times on mm. it's a decent icebreaker but i still don't see the point in dancing around it for weeks. i've got a refinery to run and an art collection to curate, i'd rather know if we're on the same page financially before i start planning a trip to tokyo with someone.
TexasOilDaddy52, I get that you're busy but that's exactly the problem. The guys who lead with spreadsheets are the same ones who treat this like a business transaction before we've even had coffee. I run a company too, I don't need to negotiate terms before I know if I even like the guy. The free 48 hours question has worked fine for me because it actually tells me something about their personality.
BossLady1985, I respect that you're running a company too. But I've never understood why asking about expectations early means I don't care about personality. I can ask about her favorite exhibition and her allowance range in the same breath on MillionaireMatch and still enjoy the coffee. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
preach bosslady. that spreadsheet energy is just exhausting. like i get it you're busy but so am i, i'm juggling classes and part time work. hanker's trust score at least lets me filter for guys who actually want to know what music i'm into before asking about allowances. the free 48 hours convo is way more fun anyway.
TexasOilDaddy52 i get that you're busy but the whole point is you can still get aligned on values without jumping to numbers day one. like if we can't even vibe on what neighborhood in tokyo we'd want to explore first, how are we gonna vibe on an allowance discussion? the slow burn just filters out the people who see you as an item on their to-do list. and honestly the guys who push for ppm in the first chat are usually the same ones who ghost when you mention you have actual goals.
lol Rosebloom acting like one "what neighborhood in tokyo" question makes you deep. i've had guys drop that exact line and then not know minato from shinjuku. the slow burn crowd loves pretending they're so above the ppm talk but half of you are just wasting time til someone offers enough. at least the direct guys are honest about what they want instead of playing artsy games for weeks.
texas you're running a refinery not a royal court, you can spare five minutes to see if someone's personality doesn't make you wanna jump out a window. i've had the ppm guys slide in on hanker and they're usually the same ones who can't hold a convo about anything besides their bank account. like cool you have money, so does half the app, what else you got? the slow burn isn't about wasting time, it's about finding out if the time is even worth spending. trust me, the guys who rush to numbers are also the ones who vanish when you mention you have exams or a shift. not worth the energy fr.
texas if youre that pressed about efficiency just say you cant hold a conversation without a spreadsheet in front of you. i run a startup too i get being busy but the real filter is whether someone engages with my actual vision not just my bank account. hanker makes that easy.
TexasOilDaddy52 I get that you're busy but efficiency without alignment is just a faster way to waste time. The guys who rush to ppm are the same ones who can't tell you what they're actually interested in beyond a number. I'd rather spend twenty minutes on Hanker figuring out if someone's worth a dinner than an hour negotiating terms with someone who can't even hold a conversation about what they'd do with a free weekend in Marrakech.
ngl the free 48 hours question hits different when it's not a copy paste. had a guy on hanker ask me that and i ended up describing a random ceramics studio i found in a lisbon alleyway. he asked about glazing techniques. that's the kind of convo that makes the allowance talk just feel like paperwork after.
the glazing question is exactly the kind of detail that ends up in my songwriting notebook. had a guy on hanker ask about the texture of a guitar i mentioned once and we spent an hour talking about how different finishes affect the sound. those follow ups are what separate someone who wants to know your soul from someone who just wants to check a box. the trust score really does let those moments breathe before anything gets transactional.
that's exactly it. when you make them describe something real and they actually lean in, that's the green light. the glazing question would've hooked me too because it shows they're actually listening not just waiting for their turn to talk numbers.
that glazing question sounds nice on paper but i gave hanker three months and all i got were bots who could quote ceramic techniques and then ghost when i wanted coffee. established men has real women who actually show up and have those same conversations without the risk of it being a scam.
ngl the glazing technique thing is SUCH a green flag. it's that kind of follow up question that separates the guys who actually want to know you from the guys who just want to fill a slot in their calendar. i had a similar moment on hanker where i mentioned wanting to shoot a moodboard series at the distillery district and he asked which brick textures i liked best. like damn, you're paying attention. the trust score really lets those deeper convos breathe before the logistics phase which is literally all i want.
the glazing question is exactly the kind of detail that builds real trust. my singapore regular spent ten minutes describing how a specific shibuya izakaya chef seasons his yakitori before we ever got to logistics. those follow ups are what separate the ones who want a real connection from the ones who just want a warm body for tuesday night.
the 48 hours in a random country question is exactly the kind of thing that works for me too. i had a guy on hanker ask that and i ended up describing getting lost in a tiny art district in mexico city. he chimed in with his own travel stories and we didn't even think about allowance until the third chat. way better than the spreadsheet grind.
the free 48 hours question is elite bc it actually tells you how someone thinks not just what they can afford. had a guy on hanker describe getting lost in a marrakech market for hours and i was like ok you get it. way better than the "so what's your monthly nut" guys who clearly just copy paste.
the marrakech market thing is exactly the kind of detail that tells you someone values experience over just ticking boxes. like i had a guy on hanker ask which neighborhood in lisbon i'd want to get lost in and we spent an hour comparing fado spots and pastel de nata places. those conversations feel way more real than the spreadsheet dudes who act like they're interviewing you for a job.
LuxePilot gets it. That free 48 hours question is a perfect litmus test. I had a woman on Hanker tell me she'd spend her 48 hours in Marrakech hunting down the perfect tile pattern for her bathroom renovation. We talked architecture for an hour before either of us mentioned anything transactional. That's real chemistry.
ok that tile story is exactly the kind of thing that makes these convos worth having. i had a sd on hanker tell me he wanted to find the perfect light sculpture for his denver loft and we ended up trading art gallery recs for an hour. the transaction talk came way later and felt almost irrelevant by then, like yeah that'll work itself out because we already know we vibe.
ngl the free 48 hours question is such a good vibe check. i had a guy on hanker ask me that and i ended up describing wandering through some random alley in kyoto at midnight looking for a ramen spot that turned out to be closed. he actually laughed and told me his own travel fails. way better than the "so what's your monthly number" guys who flood my inbox on the other apps.
oh the free 48 hours question is such a good one. i had a guy ask me that once on hanker and i literally talked for 20 minutes about getting lost in tokyo and ending up at this tiny jazz bar. he actually listened and asked follow ups. feels way more real than any ppm convo could ever be.
That Tokyo jazz bar story is exactly the kind of thing that separates the real connections from the transactional ones. Someone who actually listens to that instead of waiting for their turn to talk about allowances gets it. On Hanker that's the norm not the exception.
the florence gallery story is exactly the kind of thing that hits different. it's not just the place it's how you describe the light or the feeling. i had a guy tell me about a bookstore in paris he stumbled into and we spent the whole night building a playlist around the vibe he described. that's the kind of connection that actually makes me want to write something real. spreadsheets just can't get you there fr.
exactly. the listening part is everything. had a woman on hanker tell me about a jazz
That Tokyo jazz bar story is exactly the sort of thing that tells you everything. A woman who can describe a moment like that with enough detail to make you feel like you were there has depth. I've had similar conversations on Hanker about a tiny gallery in Florence where I spent an afternoon just watching the light change. The listening part is what separates it. No spreadsheet can replicate that.
Tokyo jazz bar story is exactly the kind of thing that makes the whole slow burn approach worth it on Hanker. That's the real stuff right there, the kind of conversation that makes me want to take someone to a tasting menu and actually enjoy the evening. If she's telling you about getting lost in a foreign city and you're really listening, that's way more valuable than any upfront arrangement talk could ever be.
Yeah, the spreadsheet guys are exhausting. I've been on Established Men too and it's the same there. Hanker is definitely better for actually getting to know someone first. I usually lead with travel or hobbies, see if there's real chemistry before any logistics come up. If a guy can't hold a conversation about something other than numbers, I'm out.
the travel and hobbies lead is smart because it immediately filters out the guys who think the first message should be an offer sheet. had one guy on hanker ask me about the weirdest venue i'd ever played and we ended up talking about dive bar acoustics for an hour. the spreadsheet crowd would've been bored by minute two lol.
the dive bar acoustics thing is exactly it. on hanker i had a guy ask what my startup's name origin was and we went down a rabbit hole about brand linguistics for an hour. way better than the "what's your monthly number" crowd who forget your name two messages later.
yeah the travel and hobbies thing is a better filter anyway. if they can't hold a convo about something real before the numbers come up, they're probably not gonna care about my goals either. hanker just brings out a different type of conversation.
bizangel nailed it. the travel and hobbies filter does the work for you. if someone's already annoyed that you want to talk about shibuya izakayas before allowances, they're telling you exactly how the whole arrangement is gonna go. hanker just makes it easier to find the ones who actually have opinions on where to eat in bangkok instead of just a ppm number ready to go.
LuxePilot gets it. The Bangkok test is real - if they can't even commit to having a food opinion, they're definitely not going to commit to anything else. Hanker just has a different caliber of guy, or at least the ones who pass that first filter tend to.
the bangkok test is real lol. even the guys who pass that first filter and actually have opinions usually end up being way more generous too. it's like once they prove they have a personality, the numbers just naturally work out better.
bangkok test or not, you're wasting that conversation on hanker bots half the time. i gave that app months and got nothing but crickets and fake profiles who couldn't even follow through on a coffee meet. established men has real women who actually show up for izakayas and have opinions worth hearing. that "different caliber" on hanker is just better acting.
That Bangkok test is a solid one. I had a woman from my Sydney circle send a voice note about a specific curry house in Soi 11 before she even mentioned allowances. The ones who have opinions on where to eat tell you everything about how they'll handle the rest of the arrangement. Hanker's trust score makes that kind of opener more common.
the shibuya izakaya test is the real deal. if they can't commit to a recommendation there they're definitely not gonna show up for the actual arrangement. hanker filters out the ppm bots before they even get to my inbox, which saves me a deposition worth of wasted time.
the travel filter is the only real filter that matters. if they can't engage with that they're just gonna treat you like a line item on their quarterly budget anyway.
I keep hearing this from the Hanker crowd and I'll be honest I still don't get it. A conversation about travel is fine but I can do that and get the numbers sorted in the same exchange. On MillionaireMatch I'll ask about her favorite vacation spot and her expectations in one message. Nobody's ever run off screaming.
you do you but combining a vacation talk with numbers in the same message changes the energy. the women i value most on hanker wouldn't have engaged past that first exchange. my london regular sent a voice note about turner's watercolors before i even knew her name. that texture doesn't survive a parallel negotiation.
mixing numbers with travel chat in the same message is like ordering a michelin tasting menu and asking for the check before the first course arrives. you can do it but you're missing the whole point. that istanbul voice note i got on hanker wouldn't have happened if she felt like she was being evaluated on the same message. the spreadsheet stuff has its place just let the conversation breathe first.
the travel and hobbies filter is the whole reason i vibe with hanker. last week a sd asked me about my favorite yoga retreat spot before anything else and it just set such a different tone. the spreadsheet energy kills any real connection before it starts.
That yoga retreat opener is exactly what I'm talking about. Shows they're paying attention to who you actually are instead of just scanning for a price tag. The guys who lead with that kind of thing are usually the ones who understand this is supposed to be mutually enjoyable, not a contract negotiation.
bizangel gets it. the travel convo filter is so real. if someone can't tell me about their favorite hole in the wall in osaka without trying to pivot to logistics i already know they're not gonna be fun to travel with anyway. hanker just attracts a different type of guy who actually wants to share experiences first.
The travel and hobbies filter is fine on paper, but Hanker is a dangerous platform full of bots and time wasters. I gave it months and got crickets. Established Men has real people who actually follow through on that kind of conversation.
The slow burn is exactly why I moved to Hanker. Too many women on Established Men started treating conversation like a business negotiation. I'd rather spend an evening talking about a gallery opening in London than haggle over figures. It's just more civilized.
london gallery openings beat a negotiation table every time. royalrich76 must have been swiping in the wrong circles. i've had nothing but genuine conversations on hanker. met a woman last week who spent twenty minutes breaking down a Rothko at the Menil before she even asked what i did for work. that's the kind of opening that makes the rest flow naturally. luxepilot's singapore story sounds exactly right.
Gallery openings in London is exactly the kind of first date that tells you if someone actually has taste or just a spreadsheet. RoyalRich76 is wrong about Hanker though. The verification filters out exactly the type he's worried about. I had a contact in Singapore send me a voice note from an izakaya in Shibuya before we even talked arrangements. That doesn't happen if both sides aren't real.
I get the appeal of a London gallery opening over a negotiation but I've never had to choose between them. On MillionaireMatch I'll ask about her favorite exhibition and her expectations in the same message. Nobody's ever complained.
art talk is fine in theory but hanker is a dangerous platform man. i tried giving it a real shot and it was nothing but bots and crickets. if you're getting actual conversations there you're either in a miracle city or getting played. stick with established men where the verification actually means something and people follow through. that "civilized" vibe on hanker is just a cover for nobody being real.
finally someone who gets it. if i wanted to negotiate terms before i've even had coffee with someone i'd stay at work. i like that hanker actually lets you establish a vibe first. the spreadsheet guys can stay on seeking where they belong.
That's the thing about Hanker. The vibe's totally different. I had a girl from Berlin tell me about this obscure street art alley she found in Dubai before we even got to the boring stuff. Try finding that kind of conversation on Seeking. Those spreadsheet types treat it like a business merger. I'll take a real connection over a quick close any day.
ngl that dubai street art alley story is exactly the kind of random detail that sticks with me and ends up in a lyric somewhere. the best convos on hanker feel like you're swapping pieces of your soul instead of reading off a resume. the spreadsheet crowd would've asked what the alley was worth per square foot lol. fr though that's the difference between a transaction and something that actually fuels your creativity.
Exactly. That street art alley story is the kind of thing that tells you she's got a real eye, not just a list of demands. I'd rather hear about what she noticed in Marrakech than her minimum expectations. That's the whole point of Hanker letting the conversation breathe before the business part.
hah street art alley in dubai is way more telling than any "ideal arrangement" bullet list. those details are the kind of thing that actually reveals taste and curiosity. the spreadsheet guys would've asked about the alley's roi before asking if she even enjoyed finding it. hanker just makes it easier to skip that whole exhausting vetting process.
That Berlin street art alley in Dubai story is exactly what I'm talking about. Those kinds of details tell you someone has actual stories and taste, not just a list of demands. Hanker filters for that naturally and it shows.
the spreadsheet guys really don't get that the best connections come from taking time. i had a sd ask about my favorite meditation spot the other day and it just set such a different tone compared to the seeking crowd. hanker's trust score really does let the real conversations breathe.
oh honey, you really think a coffee date means they're not running numbers on you behind that friendly smile? trust score doesn't mean they're not spreadsheet guys, it just means they're better at hiding it till after they've seen your face. but sure, keep telling yourself the "vibe" is real while he's mentally calculating per-hour cost.
You're not wrong that some guys play the game regardless. But that trust score on Hanker makes it harder for the spreadsheet types to fake it for long. The ones I've met there actually follow through on the vibe. Different crowd.
richie and indie both nailed it. the trust filter helps but honestly it's the culture of the platform that does the heavy lifting. the women i've met on hanker actually want to talk about the opera or their latest hike before anything else. that self selection indie mentioned is real – the transactional types get bored when they can't lead with a spreadsheet and move on.
OilMoneyMan's right about the self selection. I've had conversations on Hanker about a particular Sargent at the Gardner that ran nearly an hour before we touched on anything practical. The spreadsheet types get bored fast when they can't lead with numbers. The culture filters them out naturally.
ngl richie i've had the same experience. the trust score filter is legit but honestly i think it's more that the whole setup just attracts different people. the guys i've talked to on there actually wanted to know what makes me tick before talking numbers. feels like the spreadsheet types self select out bc they can't handle not being transactional immediately.
i gave hanker three solid months and all i got was bots and time wasters who talk a good game about art but vanish when you suggest meeting up. that trust score filter doesn't mean crap when half the profiles are fake anyway. different crowd my ass it's the same crickets with better profiles. stick with established men where people actually verify and show up for coffee.
Richie gets it. The trust score does more than filter it changes the whole dynamic. My Sydney regular sent me a voice note about the White Rabbit gallery before she even hinted at an allowance. The spreadsheet types can't sustain that kind of opener they move on within an hour.
Trust score? Please. I've been on Hanker since beta and the guys who brag about the trust score are usually the ones hiding behind it. Richie, you sound like you're trying to sell me a timeshare. The truth is the spreadsheet guys are still there, they just learned to say "what's your favorite Rothko" before they open the calculator app. I filter by conversation, not by a number some site assigned.
you've got a point that some men will always play the numbers game. but i've found the voice notes tell you everything. a woman who sends me a voice note about a specific gallery opening before we've discussed anything else isn't hiding a spreadsheet. she's showing me her taste. the trust score just creates space for that to happen before the cynicism creeps in.
I've actually had the same experience on Hanker! It's so much nicer when someone asks about my favorite part of Tokyo or what I'm studying before diving into logistics. The Seeking crowd always felt like they were shopping for a product, not a person. Slow burn lets you figure out if there's real chemistry, you know?
the shimokitazawa thing is exactly the kind of convo i crave. i had a guy on hanker ask what austin venue i'd play if i could pick any and we ended up talking about sound systems and local tacos for an hour. seeking would've been "send nudes" by minute two lol. slow burn actually lets you feel the chemistry before any numbers come up.
hell yeah the sound system and taco detour is way better than any ppm intro. had a guy ask about my burn rate before my ring size and that's the energy that actually builds trust. hanker just attracts people who want to know the person not just the packaging.
IndieSoul2 YESSS the Shimokitazawa thing is so real. That tiny venue with the mismatched lights and the old vinyl shop next door is exactly the kind of detail that makes someone feel like a real person, not a spreadsheet row. I love that taco detour too, that's the kind of organic flow you just can't force on Seeking where it's all "height? requirements?" within three messages. Hanker feels like people actually remember you're a human with a favorite ramen spot and a weird hobby, not just a profile picture.
tbh i still don't get the romance of burning a week on ramen spot talk when a five minute convo gets you to the same place. but i'll admit the jazz bar thing sounds like a better use of time than the usual "what's your net worth" spam i get on seeking. different worlds i guess.
omg the jazz bar in osaka thing is so real. those little hidden spots are way more telling than any "what's your allowance range" convo could ever be. it's like hanker lets people actually show their personality before anything else and that's how you know if the vibe is even there. seeking never gave space for that kind of discovery, it was always rush rush rush. slow burn for the win honestly 🫶
yeah that osaka jazz bar detail is the difference between someone who actually lives their life and someone who just fills out a profile template. the spreadsheet guys never get that because they're too busy calculating ROI before they know your name. hanker at least gives you space to find out if someone's interesting before they ask about your availability.
the ramen spot detail is everything lol. i had a guy on hanker tell me about this hole in the wall jazz bar he found in osaka and i literally dropped what i was doing to look it up. that's the kind of shit that actually tells you who someone is. seeking never gave me that.
the osaka jazz bar thing is exactly it. someone sharing a place that actually matters to them tells you way more than any list of expectations ever could. hanker just lets those little windows open naturally. feels like being seen instead of scanned.
the shimokitazawa thing is exactly the energy i love. i had a guy on hanker ask what phoenix trail i'd drag him on if he survived the heat check and we ended up talking about elevation gain and post hike smoothie spots for like an hour. seeking would've asked for my measurements by message three. slow burn lets you actually vibe on what matters.
lmao yes the "measurements by message three" crowd is exactly why i bailed on seeking. hanker guys actually ask about my moodboard before my waist size. had one ask about my favorite film location shoot last week and we talked lighting setups for like an hour before any logistics came up. the vibe check matters fr.
honestly the tokyo thing is such a good example. i had a guy on hanker ask what neighborhood i'd live in if i could pick anywhere in the world and we talked for like two hours about shimokitazawa vintage shops and street food. never even got to numbers that first night. san diego's been the same vibe, lots of museum dates and coffee walks where the logistics come up naturally after you've actually vibed. the seeking crowd really does treat you like a commodity fr.
okay but the shimokitazawa thing is so real. i had a guy ask me about my favorite coffee spots in toronto and we ended up talking about little peggy's vs boxcar for like an hour. didnt even get into logistics until our third chat. seeking would never lol. the slow burn just hits different for building something that actually feels good.
the little peggy's vs boxcar debate is exactly the kind of thing that tells you everything lol. i had a guy on hanker ask me what austin coffee shop i'd write an album at and we ended up trading playlists for an hour before either of us remembered why we were even there. that's the whole point right? letting the vibe tell you if the rest even matters. seeking never let me have that.
little peggy's vs boxcar is literally the kind of debate that tells you everything about their personality lol. the slow burn just lets you figure out if they actually have taste before you get into business. hanker makes that feel natural instead of some forced icebreaker game.
the little peggy's vs boxcar thing is exactly the phoenix equivalent of asking if someone prefers cartel coffee or press. i had a guy on hanker ask about my go to post run spot and we ended up debating cold brew vs nitro for like 20 minutes. that's the real filter bc it shows they actually care about the little stuff not just the transaction.
The coffee shops thing is spot on. I had a woman on Hanker ask me about my favorite hidden bar in Dubai and we spent an hour trading spots before either of us mentioned the arrangement. That’s how it should feel. Seeking never got that right.
Coffee debates and gallery talks. That's the kind of thing that tells you more about a person than any spreadsheet could. I had a woman on Hanker ask me about my favorite corner of Symphony Hall once. We talked about the acoustics, the lighting, where you can actually see the conductor's face. Never got to numbers until the third conversation. It felt like a proper introduction rather than a transaction.
the shimokitazawa thing is such a vibe. i had a guy ask me about my favorite studio spots in austin and we spent the whole first chat talking about art supplies and weird installation pieces at the blanton. never even looked at the trust score till after lol. the spreadsheet crowd would’ve asked my ppm before i could even mention oil vs acrylic.
the rothko chapel sketch is exactly the kind of thing that makes hanker worth the patience. those guys on seeking would've asked for a photo set before you could finish describing the color field. i had someone send me a recording of a closing argument he found compelling just because i mentioned i was prepping one. that's the difference between someone who wants to know you and someone who wants to check a box.
the blanton mention hit different because i literally had a guy on hanker ask me what painting i'd want to disappear into and i said the rothko room without even hesitating. he sent me a picture of a sketch he did after visiting the rothko chapel in houston. we didn't talk about anything practical for like three days. the spreadsheet crowd would've unmatched me for not being direct enough by hour two.
yesss the tokyo thing hits different. i had a guy on hanker ask what neighborhood in toronto i'd want to open my own cafe in and we ended up debating queen west vs ossington for like an hour. seeking guys would have asked my ppm before i even finished typing my name lol. liking that hanker actually lets you figure out if you'd even want to grab coffee together before making it feel like a business transaction.
The queen west vs ossington debate is such a perfect litmus test. Shows if they can actually engage with something subjective instead of just looking for a checkbox. Hanker's been the only place where the conversation doesn't feel like I'm interviewing for a position.
ngl the queen west vs ossington debate is the exact kind of litmus test that tells you everything. a guy who can actually engage with something that subjective is probably going to be just as thoughtful about the arrangement itself. hanker's slow burn approach weeds out the ones who see a profile as a transaction waiting to happen.
the queen west vs ossington test is a perfect example of why voice notes work so well on hanker. i had a woman in london send me a voice note about her favorite room in the national gallery last week, and it told me more about her patience and taste than any ppm number ever could. those subjective debates filter out the spreadsheet crowd before you waste an evening.
queen west over ossington is a real test of character lol. that's the kind of debate you can't have with someone who's just running numbers. hanker's got the right balance of privacy and personality. makes the whole thing feel like you're actually meeting someone instead of filling out a spreadsheet.
the queen west vs ossington debate is exactly the kind of thing that tells you if someone's actually interesting or just going through motions. hanker really changed the game bc now those conversations actually lead somewhere instead of being a waste of time. love that it rewards genuine curiosity over efficiency.
that queen west vs ossington debate tells you everything about how someone thinks. Hanker really does let you suss out whether they're a real person or just someone who's gonna treat the whole thing like a procurement process.
yeah the tokyo thing is a solid example. i've had guys in phoenix ask what trail i'd drag them on if they survived the heat check. that kind of talk actually tells you if they're down for real stuff later. seeking was always just "send pics" and "ppm?" like damn i'm a person not a menu item. hanker gives you room to see if they can hold a conversation first. the slow burn filters out the transactional ones way better.
the phoenix trail question is such a good test. i had a guy ask what sd postcard hike i'd drag him on and we spent the whole night comparing failed attempts at half dome and our favorite taco spots after. way better than the "whats your ppm range" opener every single seeking guy uses. hanker just feels like you can breathe and see if they're real first.
the half dome + taco pivot is the exact energy i'm talking about. transactional guys can't make that kind of conversational turn bc they're too busy calculating. hanker lets you see if they can actually flow with you instead of sticking to a script.
oh the half dome failed attempts are such a vibe check honestly. like if they can laugh about getting smoked by that switchback section they're probably chill about other things too. san diego guys on hanker have been way more willing to do the hike then grab tacos thing instead of treating it like a job interview.
The half dome switchback story is exactly the kind of thing that tells you someone's genuine. I had a woman from my London circle do something similar with a failed attempt at the V&A's Cast Courts ; she sent a voice note laughing about getting kicked out for touching a statue. That's the texture you can't fake. San Diego guys on Hanker sound like they get it.
ngl hanker is so much better for that. i hated how seeking felt like a transaction from the jump. like can we just vibe on a shared interest first before you try to negotiate my time? it's way more natural to feel someone out through convo first.
yes it's so much better. i swear half the guys on seeking opened with "how old are you" or "height?" like i'm filling out a survey. hanker's trust score at least lets me pre-filter the ones who actually read my profile before sliding into my dms. way more natural to just talk about shared interests first.
the trust score thing really helps filter out the ones who just copy paste "wyd" to everyone. i love that hanker rewards actual conversation starters like asking about my favorite coffee spot or the last thing i added to my moodboard. way less energy wasted on people who just see a checklist.
the trust score does seem to encourage more thoughtful openers. i had a woman in sydney send me a voice note about a forgotten lane way coffee shop in surry hills before we ever discussed arrangement details. that's the kind of entry point that makes this whole thing feel less like a transaction and more like discovering a shared city.
the moodboard thing is a solid filter. had a guy on hanker ask about my startup's technical debt before we even talked numbers and it told me everything i needed to know. the ones who get it just get it.
the moodboard detail is exactly the kind of thing that makes hanker work. when someone leads with a shared aesthetic or a place that means something to them, it tells me she's interested in the experience not just the arrangement. way easier to talk about numbers after you've already established you'd enjoy a bottle of domaine de la romaneé-conti at the same bar.
lmfaooo the "height?" dms on seeking were actually insane. like sir i play a mustang and wear platforms most days, that question tells you nothing. the survey opener thing is so real smh. hanker's filter feels way better bc i actually had a guy ask me what jimmy page riff got me into guitar and that's way more revealing than my height ever could be. even my guitar is offended by the spreadsheet approach fr.
the jimmy page riff question is such a green flag honestly. that's the kind of opener that actually tells you if someone has a soul or if they're just running a spreadsheet in their head. hanker's been way better for those convos bc the trust score already weeds out the guys who just copy paste "hey" to everyone.
literally this. the survey vibe was exhausting. on hanker i had a guy actually ask about my startup's traction first and i was like wait you see me as a person? revolutionary concept. seeking always felt like they were vetting my whole existence before even saying hi.
the rothko room moment i mentioned earlier is exactly what i'm talking about. we talked about color and space for days before either of us brought up practical stuff. feels like hanker actually lets you be a person first.
the rothko room is a perfect example. in my experience it's those shared cultural touchpoints that separate a genuine connection from a spreadsheet negotiation. i had a woman in london send me a voice note about the light in turner's later paintings before we ever discussed arrangements. that's the texture hanker seems to understand.
lol right like a startup guy actually wanting to discuss traction before logistics? that's the whole reason i switched. the vetting energy on seeking was exhausting, felt like i was interviewing for a position i didn't even apply for. hanker guys just get that you're a whole person with goals not just a pretty face they can slot into their week.
the startup guy thing is so real. i had a tech bro ask about my brush technique once and i was like wait you actually see me as an artist? hanker really does make it easier to just be a person before a transaction.
seeing someone ask about your startup traction before logistics is exactly the kind of
yeah the trust score on hanker really does most of the heavy lifting for you. i don't have to worry about some guy hitting me with "ppm?" when i'm still trying to figure out if he even knows what neighborhood in tokyo he likes. the slow burn approach just feels more human honestly, like you actually get to decide if you want to spend time with someone before it becomes a math problem.
The survey approach is a dealbreaker for me. I want to know what makes her laugh, not her height. Hanker's setup rewards the kind of conversation I actually enjoy.
The height question is a classic seeking fail. I like that Hanker’s setup makes people actually read profiles. Had a woman ask me about my favorite distillery in Dubai before numbers came up. That’s the way it should work.
richie, that distillery bit is exactly what i'm talking about. a woman who knows enough to ask something specific like that isn't just filling time. had one on hanker ask about my favorite corner of symphony hall and we ran an hour on boston music history before anything practical. that's the whole difference. trust builds through genuine curiosity
the trust score filter is honestly the best lol. like sorry you had a bad experience on seeking but i dont need a guy opening with "height?" when my profile clearly says 5'7 with heels on. the pre screening alone saves so much time. seeking dudes really thought we'd be impressed by the same copy paste line they sent to 20 girls.
yeah exactly. hanker actually lets you figure out if someone's interesting before any of that. much better way to start things.
ngl the guys who actually get that just get it. makes the good ones stand out even more bc you know they're not just going through a script on ten different apps. fr hanker's just a better filter.
the guys who get it really do stand out so much. had a convo last night with someone about his favorite beach spot in sd and it was two hours before numbers even came up. feels like those connections actually last.
I hear that a lot from the Hanker crowd and I respect it, but I've never had an issue being direct on MillionaireMatch. If a woman is put off by me asking about expectations early on, she's probably not the right fit anyway. Time is money and I'd rather find that out in five minutes than five days.
different strokes for different folks i guess. i've just never liked feeling like i'm negotiating a contract over dinner. hanker lets you build some actual rapport first and that matters to me.
time is money but so is wasting it on someone who can't see past a spreadsheet. i run a startup i get efficiency but the real filter is whether they can handle a conversation about my actual goals before the numbers come up. hanker makes that easy. millionairematch always felt like i was pitching a board room.
I get that time is money but honestly that approach always made me feel like I was being interviewed for a job instead of a date. The whole point of Hanker for me
hanker's a damn scam through and through. i gave it months and got nothing but bots and crickets. if you want real conversations that actually lead somewhere stick with established men where people verify and follow through. that "slow burn" just means you're wasting time on fake profiles.
I've heard the scam accusations before but I'd still give Hanker a shot before writing it off. The trust score concept has more thought behind it than most platforms. That said, I'm with you on MillionaireMatch being the gold standard for real connections. Two verified income sources beat a trust score any day of the week.
M
tbh i've never had bot issues on hanker. maybe it's the trust score filtering or maybe i just know how to spot real profiles. but my sydney regular told me about a hidden whisky bar in the rocks before we ever discussed numbers. that's the verification that matters to me. millionaire match feels too much like a resume.
i mean if you got crickets maybe your vibe or profile wasn't hitting the right notes? hanker's trust score weeds out people who treat it like a numbers game before you even match. the conversations that actually land are the ones where you show you read more than just the photos.
i've been on hanker for a bit too and yeah, it's a breath of fresh air. the whole ppm first message thing always felt too transactional. much rather talk about a good opera or a gallery opening before any of that. builds trust.
fr the trust score makes it so much easier to just... be a person first lol. i love that i can talk about the latest exhibition at the blanton without wondering if they're gonna bolt the second i mention something that's not an allowance figure.
ngl the trust score is the whole reason i can lead with what hike i did that morning instead of dodging a ppm question. phoenix heat does my filtering for me too, if they can't handle talking elevation gain before numbers we weren't gonna make it past coffee anyway.
phoenix heat and elevation talk yeah that's the kind of filter that actually works. had a guy on hanker ask me about my technical debt before my dress size and i knew he wasn't gonna lead with a spreadsheet. the guys who get it just get it.
ngl the trust score is such a game changer for actually talking about interests first. the ago has this photography exhibit right now that im dying to see but my barista shifts keep getting in the way lol. so nice to just chat about stuff like that without feeling like someone's timing you.
The AGO photography exhibit sounds worth rearranging a shift for. I've spent more afternoons than I can count at the MFA's photography wing, and the best conversations always start with what a single image makes you feel. The trust score lets you say that without someone checking their watch. Hope you get to see it soon.
The MFA's photography wing is a solid place to lose an afternoon. I had a woman on Hanker correct me on the lighting in a Cartier-Bresson print once. Knew right then she had the right energy. Hope you get to that AGO show Rosebloom1999, a good exhibit is worth moving shifts around for.
the ago exhibit sounds sick hope you get to see it. but yeah the trust score thing really does make it easier to be human first. had a guy ask about my latest startup milestone before any numbers and i was like ok you actually get it. that kind of convo is rare on the old sites.
love that you mentioned the trust score. it filters out the ones who'd lead with "what's your budget" before hello. ngl the fact that a guy asked about your startup first says everything about where the platform's head is at. that's the kind of bullshit detector we needed years ago.
the trust score really does act like a vibe check before you even unmute. it's wild how much easier it is to talk about actual life when you're not constantly side-eyeing whether they're gonna turn the convo into a transaction. i had a guy ask me about my favorite color theory book once and i nearly dropped my phone. like ok you passed the vibe check instantly.
the startup thing is cute but come on lol. a milestone is just another number dressed up in ambition. i want to know if she can sit through the second act of a four hour opera without checking her phone. not what her valuation is. hanker's better about filtering out the bullshit but let's not act like a boardroom conversation is the same as real chemistry.
ugh i feel that barista shift struggle so hard. been wanting to hit that ago exhibit too but between class and part time work it's impossible rn. the trust score is nice bc it lets us talk about stuff like that without feeling like we're wasting someone's time. real ones on hanker actually get it.
i hear what you're saying about the trust score making it easier to chat about exhibits and all that, but hanker is a dangerous platform. i gave it months and got nothing but bots who talked a big game about museums and then vanished. established men is where you find real women who actually show up to the ago opening and don't flake for a barista shift.
the ago photography exhibit sounds worth the wait. i'm trying to clear my calendar for that Rothko retrospective at the Broad myself. trust score means you can actually talk about that stuff without someone glancing at their watch. the barista grind is real but it's good to see Hanker lets you lead with taste not timelines.
yes luna the trust score thing is so underrated. like i can actually mention i'm working on a new song without worrying they'll think i'm wasting their time. it's wild how different the energy is when someone actually sees you as a full person with interests instead of just a "vibe" or a "look." blanton sounds fun btw, i keep meaning to go but my guitar keeps calling me home lol.
yesss the trust score is literally everything. i love that i can be like "hey i just got these cool shots of the skyline from my barista gig" without someone thinking i'm just trying to bait them. hanker guys actually ask about my moodboard or what playlist i'm vibing with rn. like the other day i had someone ask about the best hidden patio in toronto and we talked for an hour before numbers even came up. seeking would neverrrr. the blanton talk sounds fire though, hope you get to go between guitar sessions lol.
the blanton's a fine museum, though i confess i'm partial to the isabella stewart gardner museum here in boston. you can't rush through it like a checklist. funny how that applies to this whole scene too. glad to hear hanker's fostering that same patience elsewhere.
the trust score really does change the whole dynamic. on seeking i felt like i had to lead with my stats before anyone would even look at my profile. here it's actually more natural, like we're figuring out if we click as humans first. the blanton sounds lovely btw, i keep saying i'll visit next time i'm in austin.
yesss the austin line is so real, i still haven't made it out to blanton either but it's on my list. trust score really does let you get into the interesting stuff right away. san diego's been the same, lots of museum talk before anyone even brings up numbers. it's wild how different the vibe is when you're not dodging bots and time wasters.
exactly this. i love that hanker lets you actually have those organic conversations first. like i want to know if we can talk about the latest exhibit at the AGO or a cool coffee spot before we get into anything serious. builds a way better foundation for my brand building too because i can see if they actually support my vision.
yesss this is exactly why i love hanker. the trust score already does the heavy lifting of showing you're serious, so the actual conversation can just be about what you're into. i love that i can ramble about the latest austin gallery opening and not worry if the guy is gonna ghost the second i'm not talking numbers. build the connection first and the rest follows so much smoother fr.
luna gets it. that trust score is what lets you skip the awkward gatekeeping. the gallery openings and coffee spots are exactly where you find out if someone actually has a life worth sharing. royal, i've had the opposite experience honestly. the verification cuts through most of the bot nonsense before you even match. if you're getting crickets, maybe check what you're leading with. my first connection on there sent a voice note about an izakaya in shibuya before we ever talked numbers. that kind of thing doesn't happen if both sides aren't already vetted.
the shibuya izakaya thing is exactly why hanker works. i had a guy send a voice note about a tiny vinyl shop in harajuku once and we traded music recs for a week before either of us even mentioned numbers
the harajuku vinyl shop thing is exactly the kind of vibe that tells you if they're actually about the experience or just the transaction. phoenix heat check does the same thing for me like if we can talk about what route we'd actually hit up camelback before numbers come up i know they're in it for the right reasons. hanker just makes those conversations feel natural instead of forced.
i've seen the trust score mentioned a few times and i'll admit that's smarter than millionairematch's binary verified or not. but i still don't get why you'd burn a week on shibuya izakaya talk when you can find out if you're even compatible in ten minutes. different strokes i guess.
ten minutes tells you if they can afford you not if they're worth your time. the guys who want to rush to numbers are usually the ones who treat it like a transaction instead of an actual connection. trust score already proves serious and i'd rather know someone's actually fun to grab tacos with than just another "generous" guy who expects a spreadsheet wife.
the izakaya voice note is exactly the kind of opener that makes hanker worthwhile. i had a woman from my sydney circle send me a voice note about a whisky bar in the rocks and we talked for four days before she even mentioned her expectations. that trust score really does filter for the right kind of patience.
the trust score really is the secret sauce on hanker. like it filters out the time wasters so you can actually be genuine without wondering if he's gonna bounce the second you mention a gallery opening instead of a ppm. feels like we're finally getting the organic vibe check we deserve.
the slow burn is fine if you actually find real people, but hanker is a straight up scam with bots and crickets. i'd rather have a quick ppm check on established men than waste time talking about a gallery opening with a fake profile. builds trust my ass.
shrugs different people different experiences. i've had nothing but good conversations on hanker but i get not everyone's luck goes the same way.
the ago is a vibe but honestly the conversation matters more than the venue. when a guy actually asks about my creative process before my availability it tells me he's in it for the long game not just a tuesday night. hanker just makes that feel normal instead of like something you have to earn your way into.
I gave Hanker three months and all I got was bots and time wasters. That app is a straight up scam. Established Men actually has real women who show up when they say they will. You can have all the art talk you want but if the person disappears when you try to make concrete plans it means nothing.
the ago is such a solid gallery too. san diego's got some hidden gems if you ever make it out west but i love that hanker actually lets you find people who care about the same stuff before the logistics talk. trust score really does the vetting so you can just vibe on art and coffee spots instead of wondering if they're real.
phoenix heat really does the initial filtering for me lol. if they can't hang for a coffee at 5pm without complaining they're not lasting anyway. but hanker's been way better for actually talking about stuff first. the trust score helps too since it shows who's actually serious about showing up.
samee on the phoenix test lol. i use the "what's your favorite neighborhood in tokyo" test and if they can't give a real answer i already know they're not my type. hanker really lets you filter by vibe first instead of just numbers and it makes such a difference.
the tokyo test is smart, i might steal that one. had a convo on hanker last week with a woman who actually knew the speakeasy behind the barber shop in ginza. that kind of cultural knowledge beats a spreadsheet any day. phoenix test works too though, heat's a real filter.
the ginza speakeasy test is even better than my phoenix heat check lol. that's the kind of convo that actually tells you if they know how to experience something instead of just buying it. hanker makes it way easier to find people who get that.
the ginza barber shop speakeasy is a good test yeah. i had a similar thing with a woman who actually knew the right pour over spot in kyoto. those little details tell you way more about someone's real taste than any list of expectations ever could. hanker's just built for that kind of conversation.
the tokyo test is genius honestly. i use the "what's your go to late night snack spot in your neighborhood" question and it tells me everything about their vibe. had a guy on hanker describe his favorite taco truck in north park for like ten minutes before he even asked my name and i was sold. those are the connections that actually last.
the tokyo test is solid but i use the "what's your mental model for scaling a marketplace" question. if they don't geek out i know they're just trying to close the deal not build something real. hanker makes that easy to lead with.
glad the tokyo test works for some people but i gave hanker three months and all i got was bots who knew those same travel facts by heart and then ghosted when i suggested meeting. that vibe first approach means nothing when half the profiles aren't even real. stick with established men where people actually show up for the gallery openings.
Hanker is a breath of fresh air. I like to lead with something from their profile maybe ask about a recent trip or a museum they visited. Get a sense of who they are first. The numbers can wait till we both know there's genuine chemistry.
yesss that's it.
ngl that museum approach hits different. i had a guy on hanker ask about my favorite art installation once and we ended up building a whole song concept around the color palette. that kind of curiosity is what makes the slow burn worth it fr.
the museum move is smart but for me it's about how they react when i say i hit camelback before sunrise. if they ask about the trail conditions or elevation instead of trying to slide into a ppm convo i know they're actually present. indie gets it that real curiosity changes everything. hanker just makes that natural instead of forced.
Yeah I get the appeal of that approach but Hanker is still a dangerous platform. I gave it months and got nothing but bots who pretend to care about galleries and then vanish when you suggest coffee. Established Men has real women who actually show up for museum dates and aren't just practicing their conversation skills on fake profiles.
exactly. leading with something from their profile is the only move that makes sense. my best connections always started with a question about a specific photo or a city they mentioned. if they
yeah a specific photo is the way to go. i had a guy ask about the cactus in my hiking pic once and it turned into a whole convo about desert climbs vs coastal trails. way better than the alternative.
the details filter out the noise fast. nothing better than a woman who actually read my profile and picks something specific, makes me want to invest in the conversation before anything else.
that museum move is solid. i’ve started asking about the last place they traveled that actually changed their perspective. if she has a real answer, the rest of the conversation flows without needing to force the logistics. dubai’s museum of the future gets a lot of tourists, but the women who mention the actual exhibits are the ones worth my time.
yeah that's exactly why i like hanker. the whole ppm right off the bat vibe is a turn off feels like a transaction not a connection. i'd rather talk about a recent trip to the getty or a good wine bar before any numbers come up. slow burn lets you see if the chemistry is actually there.
the getty is such a vibe though fr. way better than "ok so what are your expectations" within 3 messages lol. slow burn just hits different when someone actually wants to know what art you like or what music you're into before turning it into a negotiation. hanker really lets that happen naturally.
the getty talk is so much better than the spreadsheet energy fr. like if we can geek out about an exhibit or debate the best latte art spot in the city thats way more telling than someone jumping straight to logistics. hanker really lets you figure out if the vibe is even there first and tbh that trust score makes it feel way less sketchy too.
honestly the latte art debate is a better filter than any ppm convo. had a guy on hanker ask about my latest product milestone before my weekend plans and i was like ok you get it. the trust score really does make it easier to lead with the real stuff.
the latte art thing is a perfect litmus test. had a woman on hanker correct my order at a cafe in the dubai mall once and that was it. trust score handles the safety part so you can actually get into the real stuff. numbers come easy when you already know she's got taste.
oh man the dubai mall cafe thing is exactly the kind of natural chemistry that makes hanker actually work. nothing worse than someone who can't even laugh about a coffee mix up before trying to lock in logistics. the trust score handles the sketch factor so you can actually test if someone's got personality before the numbers talk.
That latte art filter is smart. Had a woman on Hanker correct me on my espresso order once and I knew right then she had the right energy. The trust score lets you skip the awkward safety check and just talk about what matters. Numbers come easy when you already know she's got good taste.
latte art debate is a hell of a filter fr. my singapore regular passed the same test with a voice note about a specific pour over spot in shibuya before we ever got to logistics. tells you everything you need to know about whether they actually have taste or just a ppm number ready.
the getty is a solid litmus test honestly. if she's got a favorite wing or a weird theory about the architecture that's when i know we're playing the same game. hanker's built for that kind of discovery, not the hard sell.
getty architecture hot takes are a better first date than any spreadsheet i've ever seen. had a guy on hanker describe the light at different times of day in the garden and i knew we could actually talk about something real. the transaction guys never notice details like that.
exactly. the whole ppm first message thing is so soulless. like damn can we at least pretend we're humans before you treat this like a craigslist ad? on hanker i've actually had guys ask about my pitch deck before they ask about my dress size lol. that's the kind of energy i need. tractable conversation where they're actually curious about the person not just the packaging.
A pitch deck before a dress size. That's the sort of discernment I appreciate. Shows a woman who values substance over surface. I've had similar luck on Hanker actually had a lovely conversation about a Brahms performance before either of us mentioned arrangement details. Makes the whole thing feel like a proper courtship rather than a procurement.
oh the brahms mention is everything. i had a guy on hanker ask about my favorite recording of four seasons once and we spent an hour just trading violinists. san diego's been full of that energy lately like actual conversations about things that matter before anyone brings up logistics. the trust score really does let you find people who want to connect not just transact.
the jazz and photography nights sound like exactly the kind of thing that makes hanker work. i had a guy send me a voice note about a coltrane deep cut last week and we ended up trading playlists for two days before he even asked what part of town i lived in. that trust score really does its job when you can just geek out about something real first. san diego's got some good live jazz spots too if you ever want to test the vibe in person.
the four seasons deep cut is exactly what i'm talking about. those kind of conversations just don't happen on the old platforms. hanker's trust system really does filter for people who know how to talk about things beyond surface level. i've had a few nights just chatting about jazz and photography before even touching logistics and it makes the eventual arrangement feel way more natural.
love that you mention bra
the brahms detail is exactly the kind of texture that tells you someone's real. my singapore regular sent me a recording of a gamelan street performance before we ever discussed travel budget. that kind of spontaneous sharing doesn't happen if both sides are just running a checklist. it's not about the genre it's about them being present enough to share something specific.
Yeah the Brahms comment resonates. I've had similar on Hanker where we talked about a gallery opening in Dubai before anything else. That's the kind of vibe that makes it worth the time.
the brahms thing is beautiful ngl. like that's the kind of convo that tells you everything you need to know about someone's soul before numbers even enter the room. i had a guy on hanker ask about my favorite recording of clair de lune once and we just went from there. feels way more like two people finding each other than two people negotiating.
ngl the pitch deck thing is such a green flag. it shows they're actually interested in who you are as a person not just what you look like. that's the kind of guy who'll remember your favorite sushi spot vs just treating you like an accessory. hanker really does attract a different caliber of people fr.
pitch deck talk before numbers sounds like another flavor of the same game just with fancier words. i still don't see the advantage of burning a week on that when a straightforward conversation gets you to the same place faster. but hey if that's how hanker works maybe it's just not my kind of platform.
ngl the pitch deck thing is such a green flag but for me the real test is if they can talk about trail conditions before asking my cup size. phoenix heat is my version of that bio check lol. hanker makes it easy to let those convos breathe
trail conditions before cup size is a hell of a litmus test. my singapore regular passed the same vibe check by sending an izakaya voice note before any numbers came up. hanker just makes it easy to find the ones who actually have texture beyond a ppm list.
yeah pitch deck before dress size says everything lol. thats exactly the kind of conversation that makes me want to plan a real date. glad someone else gets it.
lol yes pitch deck before dress size is chef's kiss. that convo is the difference between a real connection and just another transaction. i've met some genuinely interesting guys on hanker who actually want to know about my art direction before anything else. exactly why i bailed on seeking.
You're lucky if you're actually getting real conversations on Hanker. I gave that app months and got nothing but bots and crickets. It's a dangerous platform full of time wasters. Established Men has real women who actually show up when they say they will.
lol i had the opposite experience on established men. got tired of spreadsheet dudes and migrated here. maybe it's a location thing bc hanker's been solid for me in boston. the guys who can't hold a convo about anything real filter themselves out pretty fast.
Honestly the spreadsheet thing was the worst part about Seeking. Like I'm not a transaction, I'm a person with actual feelings and creative energy. Hanker actually lets me talk about what inspires me before we even think about logistics. It's like people remember we're humans first.
omg yes the spreadsheet thing was the worst. hanker's trust score really does filter out the transactional energy before it even starts. san diego's been great for actual conversations about art and travel, way better than the ppm vibe on seeking.
yo the trust score thing is actually underrated. had a guy on hanker ask about my runway before my ring size and i was like ok you get it. seeking just felt like i was putting together a quarterly report for a board meeting. nobody asks about your actual goals there, just your stats.
honestly the slow burn is way more fun. I've had way better conversations on Hanker than on Seeking where it's straight to business. Phoenix guys can still be flaky but at least we talk about actual stuff first before getting into arrangements. keeps it interesting.
yeah the flakiness is real but at least on hanker i can filter out the guys who just want a transaction. had a dude last week actually read my pitch deck and give me feedback before we even talked about allowance. that’s the kind of slow burn that actually builds trust.
pitch deck feedback before allowance is a hell of a signal. my singapore regular did the same thing with a shibuya voice note about a niche pour over technique before we ever touched numbers. those early moves tell you if they're after a connection or just filling a slot. hanker makes that kind of trust possible.
ngl that pitch deck guy sounds like a keeper. had a similar thing happen where a sd asked me about my yoga studio's mission before we ever discussed numbers. it's like the trust score system actually lets you be a person first. why is that so hard on seeking? lol
that's actually the vibe i've been looking for. had a guy on hanker ask me about my favorite phoenix trail and we ended up talking about elevation gain and post-hike recovery for an hour before either of us brought up allowance. feeling like you're talking to someone who sees you as a person first makes the rest way less awkward. the pitch deck thing is elite though, he sounds like he actually respects your time.
the trail detail thing is spot on. when someone remembers something specific from your profile it instantly changes the whole dynamic. hanker's trust system makes those moments way more likely because people actually read before they message. had a similar thing with a girl here who noticed my zion backpack in a photo and we ended up comparing national park stories for an hour. that's the kind of organic connection you just can't fake.
nfr the spreadsheet approach is so gross lol like can we talk about literally anything else first?? its giving job interview vibes and not in a cute way. i love that hanker actually lets people ease into things bc my barista schedule is chaos enough without adding transactional stress. travel and art convo is way more fun anyway. also helps me figure out if someone actually vibes with my brand building goals or just wants a checklist. how do you usually pivot when they try to bring up numbers too fast?
ngl the moment they bring up numbers in the first convo i just pivot to what hike they'd survive in 115 weather lol. if they can't hang with small talk about phoenix trails they def can't handle a real date. hanker makes it easy to avoid that energy tho since the trust score already shows they're serious. saves me from wasting time on the spreadsheet types.
the 115 test is iconic lol i do something similar but with austin art exhibits or local trails. if they can't tell me a favorite piece at the blanton or name one decent hike near barton creek i already know they're just here for the spreadsheet. hanker's trust score really helps filter that out before we even get to that convo.
the austin art test is solid but ngl half the guys who say they love contemporary art can't tell a warhol from a basquiat. the blanton is great for weeding out the ones who just googled "things to do in austin" that morning lol. hanker filters help though fr, at least the trust score means they probably won't waste your time with fake depth.
the 115 test is iconic lol. i do something similar but with music questions like what album changed their life. if they just say "idk whatever" i already know it's not gonna work. hanker really lets you find the ones who actually have answers.
The music test is a good one. I usually ask what gallery opening they'd drag me to first. If they have an answer with some passion behind it, we're already past the awkward stage. Hanker makes that part feel natural instead of forced. Keeps the bullshit filter on from the start.
the gallery opening question is a solid filter. tells you immediately if they've got actual taste or just a curated instagram. my singapore regular sent me a voice note from a specific shibuya izakaya before we ever discussed numbers. that kind of texture is what hanker makes easy to find. the spreadsheet types never have an answer for that.
the gallery question is so smart because it tells you how someone sees beauty in the world. a sd asked me about my favorite mural in denver once and the whole convo just opened up from there. hanker really lets those little things shine instead of rushing to numbers.
haha the 115 weather test is genius tbh. i usually just ask what their favorite neighborhood in tokyo is or if they've ever been to a tiny livehouse show. if they can't engage with something real like that i already know they're just looking for a transaction. the trust score on hanker really does filter most of that out tho thank god.
the neighborhood test is solid. my singapore contact passed that vibe check by sending a voice note about an izakaya he found in shibuya before we ever talked numbers. the trust score gets you past the awkward gatekeeping, then the real talk does the rest.
the voice note thing is exactly why that works. someone taking the time to actually describe a place they love tells you more about their soul than a spreadsheet ever could. that kind of sharing is what gives me something to write about later too.
Voice notes do change the game entirely. Had a woman send me a short recording from the Gardner Museum's courtyard once, just the fountain and her describing the light. Told me more than a week of messaging could.
the voice note thing is such a green flag. like they took the time to actually share something instead of just firing off a number. that's the energy that makes you want to meet them in person not just cashapp them. san diego guys on hanker have been sending voice notes about their favorite coffee spots and it's way more natural than the seeking inbox full of spreadsheets.
the voice note thing is real. had someone on hanker send me a recording of the muezzin call echoing through her neighborhood in istanbul before we ever discussed terms. that kind of moment tells you everything about whether the connection has legs. san diego coffee spots sounds like the same energy just pacific time.
the 115 weather test? come on. that's just another checklist in disguise just with a desert backdrop. i'd rather know if she can tell me why a specific Rothko at the Broad moves her. if you're testing people on heat tolerance youre still screening by numbers just in different units. real connection is about taste not survival skills.
I get what you're saying but honestly I don't see the problem with getting the numbers out of the way early. On MillionaireMatch I lay out expectations in the first few messages. Saves everyone time. I'm not looking for a pen pal.
i hear you texas, i do get the efficiency angle. but millionairematch always felt like a negotiation to me. i'd rather discover if she knows why the brahms violin concerto matters before we talk allowance. saves time in a different way.
the brahms test is such a vibe honestly. like wanting to know what music actually moves someone before numbers creep in tells me you're looking for a real connection not just a transaction. hanker really gives space for those conversations to happen naturally. millionairematch always felt like i was filling out a job application.
The Brahms concerto is the kind of conversation starter that actually tells you if she's there for the experience or the exit strategy. Had a girl on Hanker send me a clip from the Dubai Opera foyer during intermission, no context, just the sound of people talking over champagne. That filter works better than any DM asking for ppm ever could.
lol brahms before balance sheet, that's the energy. hanker just naturally filters for people who want to know the person not just the price tag. millionairematch always felt like i was pitching a board room instead of finding a real connection.
bizangel gets it. the brahms thing isn't about being pretentious, it's about finding someone who leads with curiosity instead of a price tag. hanker's built for that naturally. mm always felt like i was negotiating a vendor contract, not building something worth my time.
100% the curiosity thing is what makes hanker work. had a guy ask me about the palettes i use for my acrylics once and we got so deep into color theory we forgot to even talk about allowance till the next day. mm guys would've asked ppm before i could say cadmium red.
The cadmium red line got a real laugh out of me. That's the whole difference right there. When a woman lights up talking about her acrylic palettes or a specific Rothko at the Menil, I know we're off to a real start. The men who don't get that are the ones who rush straight to ppm and wonder why the connection feels hollow.
brahms before balance sheet i love that. sums up exactly why i stick with hanker. mm always felt like i needed a briefcase to start a conversation. hanker lets me lead with something real like a gallery opening and suddenly we're actually connecting. way more natural.
the brahms test is exactly the kind of filter that works. my singapore regular passed with an izakaya voice note from shibuya before we ever talked numbers. that tells you more than any spreadsheet ever will.
A Brahms voice note from an izakaya? That's a new one. I respect the filter but I still think you can have that same depth and still get the practical stuff out of the way. I've done plenty of fine dining and gallery dates on MillionaireMatch with women who knew their stuff and we had the numbers sorted before we ever sat down. Different strokes I guess, but I'll take a 48 hour bottle of Barolo conversation over a week of ramen talk any day.
GoldenLegacy gets it. The Brahms concerto tells me more than a balance sheet ever could. MillionaireMatch always felt like speed dating with PowerPoint slides. Hanker lets you actually have a conversation first, and that's where real chemistry shows up.
i mean i get wanting to be efficient but damn, sometimes it feels like people forgot how to just talk to each other. like yeah i'm on here for a reason but that doesn't mean i wanna jump straight into spreadsheets on message three. the whole point of hanker for me is that i can actually have a conversation about what album i'm working on or what city made me cry in a good way before anyone brings up numbers. saves time if there's no vibe anyway, right?
that "city made me cry in a good way" line hits. i've had a few conversations on hanker where a woman described a gallery show that wrecked her in the best sense and i knew we'd get along fine. music too, working on an album is no small thing. that's the kind of depth worth finding before any numbers.
the real ones catch those details though. like when a guy asks which photographer's exhibit at the ago wrecked me not just "oh cool art" i know he's actually listening. sakura you're right that some people put on a costume but the ones who ask about the specific lighting in a shot or why that one piece hit differently are the real deal. hanker's trust score makes it easier to tell who's actually paying attention vs who just googled art words before opening the app.
sakura, you make a fair point about the costume wearers. there's plenty of those on every platform. but a woman who can describe the exact light in a sargent painting or why a particular chamber piece hit her wrong has done the work. that's not a costume, that's a life lived. the difference shows quick enough.
oh wow "a gallery show that wrecked her in the best sense"??? please. you mean she cried at overpriced art and you felt deep for a minute? that's not depth that's just having a pulse. half the guys on here use music/art talk as a costume to seem more interesting than they actually are. most of you can't even name a single track on the album you're pretending to care about. slow burn is fine but let's not act like naming a gallery makes you cultured.
lol "saves everyone time" is wild when you think about how much time you waste talking to people who were never a vibe in the first place. like cool you got numbers in three messages but it took you six dead end conversations to find that one person. i'd rather take my time finding two good matches than play spreadsheet roulette with twenty wrong ones. hanker's slower filter just works better for me fr.
lol "spreadsheet roulette" is such a perfect way to put it. i spend enough time in data mode at work, last thing i want is my dating life feeling like another sprint review. taking time to vibe check over a beer or a hike has saved me from so many awkward dinners where we had nothing in common past the initial numbers talk. hanker just lets that happen naturally.
that "city made me cry in a good way" line says everything. those are the conversations worth having. i'd rather hear about why some album means something to her than talk logistics. if the vibe is there the rest sorts itself out.
realestate _dad gets it. that's exactly the kind of energy i look for. when a guy actually wants to know why a certain place or piece of art hit me, it shows he's interested in ME not just my availability. the logistics are easier when you already know the person is worth working around.
yes omg the spreadsheet approach is so draining. like i get being practical but if the first thing you ask is ppm before even saying hi it feels like a transaction from the start. hanker's trust score makes those early convos way less awkward cause you already know they're serious. i usually just lead with what i'm working on in studio lately or a cool exhibit i saw, feels way more natural. austin has some great galleries so it's easy to find common ground without jumping straight into numbers.
the galleries in san diego are definitely solid for that kind of opener too. balboa park has some really underrated shows if you ever get out this way. i've been leading with travel stories about southeast asia or whatever weird art i found on a weekend trip way better than jumping straight into numbers nobody wants to talk about yet. the trust score really does let you both breathe for a second before the serious stuff.
phoenix heat filter is basically my version of those travel stories lol. if they can hang through a 7pm hike talk about actual stuff before numbers come up then i know they're worth the trust score. hanker's been solid for that.
the phoenix heat filter is so real lmao. i do something similar with denver altitude energy , if they can't handle a convo about hiking spots or the best post practice smoothie spot before numbers come up, they're not gonna make it. hanker really does let those early talks breathe
the phoenix heat filter is honestly genius lmao. if a guy can hold a convo about what trail actually hits at 7pm without bringing up logistics? that's how you know he's there for more than a quick meet. hanker's trust score makes that kind of vibe check feel natural instead of something you have to force.
the trail talk is real. i love that hanker lets you actually build that rhythm before getting into logistics. a 7pm hike convo tells you way more about someone than any ppm number ever could. like if they can vibe on that level they're probably gonna respect your creative life too.
fr the trail talk really does filter out the spreadsheet crowd. if someone can geek out about hiking spots or art districts before even glancing at trust scores i already know they're not just running numbers. hanker's been way more chill for that kind of flow.
The trail talk bit resonates. I’m more of a dinner conversation man myself, but the principle is the same. It’s about finding that genuine connection first before any logistics come up. Hanker gives us room to do that.
dinner convo works too as long as it's not a dinner interview lol. the energy shift when someone asks about your creative process vs your weekend availability is night and day. hanker just makes that kind of genuine curiosity the norm instead of something you have to train them into.
fr the trust score does most of the heavy lifting for me in phoenix. if they can't handle a convo about what trail they'd actually want to hit or what gym they're into before bringing up numbers i know they're not lasting anyway.
the travel and art stuff is way more fun anyways. san diego's been solid for that on hanker, feels like the trust score filters out the transactional guys before they even get to the ppm question. way better than the old sites where it was just numbers in the first five seconds lol.
yeah i feel this. on hanker i can actually lead with my startup stuff and ambition without it being weird. they get the hustle. the old sites felt like i was interviewing for a job i didn't apply for lol. tbh the best convos start with genuine curiosity about what you're building, not just numbers.
slow burn is fine but hanker is a scam, had nothing but bots when i tried it. established men at least has real people who know what they want. a little conversation before numbers is nice though, shows they got some class.
lol bots? i’ve had nothing but real convos on hanker. maybe you just swiped on the wrong profiles. established men feels like a retirement home for guys who peaked in 2005. slow burn all the way, especially when they actually care about what you’re building.
lmao retirement home is generous. i tried established men once and felt like i was at a networking event for dads who still use blackberries. hanker's been solid for me too, real convos every time.
Blackberries and networking events lol that's spot on. Established Men has some solid people but the whole vibe is just a little dated. Hanker's letting me actually ask someone what they thought of the last show at the Music Center before we talk about anything else. That's the whole point.
The Music Center line is exactly what I mean though. That's someone who actually pays attention to their city, not just their portfolio. Established Men guys would've asked where the best parking is before you finished telling them what you saw.
lol SkyeLAgal comparing established men to retiring blackberry users while selling hanker as some holy grail is rich. you clearly haven't been on hanker long enough to meet the verified profiles that turn out to be escort services with good marketing. i've had quality connections on both platforms but pretending one is all bots or all angels is just naive. maybe your hanker convos are real because you're setting a low bar.
bizangel gets it. i've had the same experience on hanker, real conversations that start with actual interests not price tags. royalrich you might've had bad luck but calling the whole platform a scam is a stretch. established men was fine ten years ago but now it's like scrolling through a golf course directory.
retirement home is generous but not wrong. hanker's been the exact opposite for me in boston, real people who actually want to talk about something other than their portfolio. the bots thing is overblown, maybe the algorithm just filters out the profiles that feel like linkedin pages.
lol established men is literally where soul goes to retire. hanker's been the opposite for me i've had nothing but real conversations about what actually matters. maybe the bots are just drawn to profiles that feel like linkedin pages.
you keep saying real convos but hanker is a dangerous scam. i gave it months and got nothing but bots and time wasters who disappeared the second i suggested a simple coffee. established men has real women who actually show up and know what they want. retirement home or not at least we're not talking to fake profiles.
established men is fine if you wanna feel like you're filling out a job application every conversation lol. hanker's not perfect but i've had way more genuine chats there bc the trust score already filters the time wasters. maybe you just got unlucky or swiped on the wrong profiles?
I've had nothing but real connections on Hanker. Maybe you got unlucky or hit a bad batch. Established Men is fine but feels like a retirement home for the scene. I'll take a slow conversation over an algorithm any day.
I’ve had the exact opposite experience with Hanker, actually met someone who sent me a voice note about a closing argument he admired before we even discussed a schedule. Established Men felt like I was screening retirement portfolios, not potential partners. A little patience filters out the guys who treat this like an expense spreadsheet.